Tuesday, April 28, 2009

City says NO to NEXUS! ...... again......

"Residential, day care and early childhood facilities have no place within an industrially zoned district of the city,"
Daniel Kaplan wrote.
**********************
"Sex offenders in an unlocked correctional facility have no place within a residential, day care, FAMILY zoned district
of what was once our private neighborhood,"
Hannabelle wrote.
*********************
Game over. Nexus lost.

Friday, April 24, 2009

City Council Says NO to NEXUS!

City Council Says No to Nexus!

Nuh, nuh, nuh. Not the ONAMIA city council. Don't make me laugh! When it comes to their beloved sex offenders, for some reason the Dahmerville "officials" just can't say no. It was SMART people on the FAIRMONT city council who said "no" to Nexus - They said "no" when Nexus pressured them to change THEIR city plan (at least THEY have one) and change THEIR zoning laws to (once again) accommodate this tyrannical, parasitic organization. (yeah Vic. Go for it.)

I can't report too much about the Nexus failed juvenile detention center down in southern Minnesota because Nexus neglected to provide details (shhhh. Its a secret...) to the Dahmerville city council - even while demanding tax abatement, of course. It seems to be a "don't ask, don't tell, show me the money!" situation.

According to a tip I received, Nexus bought the Five Lakes juvenile detention center several years ago and couldn't make it succeed. Nexus FAILED??? hmmm. This is what my "Tipster" told me. Anyway, according to the Fairmont Sentinel (a REAL newspaper with REAL reporters), the Nexus facility has been empty since 2002. Now they're trying to sell it -

but because the correctly placed Fairmont juvenile detention facility is in an area away from families - zoned INDUSTRIAL (notice it is NOT in a residential area), Nexus is determined to get the zoning changed so that they can dump the defunct facility. They do not care about how this affects the city or the citizens. Its only about Nexus. Its ALL about Nexus. It always is.

I'd say, there goes their lawyer's argument in MY case that Nexus allegedly didn't have anything to do with changing OUR zoning laws. Of course they did. You cannot deny the true nature of Nexus. (You remember the story of the Scorpion and the Frog???)

Well, we see another pattern with Nexus. Nexus attorney Mark Manderfeld is working Fairmont like he worked over Onamia. And get this - the opposition has been accused of hating kids, just like I was. When I first heard Nexus was coming to destroy our neighborhood, I thought they were just looking for a place to build a new facility. I honestly didn't begrudge them that. At first. Little did I know the lengths they would pursue in order to harm anyone who got in their way, (or even criticized them.)

Familiarity breeds contempt.

And I am now very familiar with Nexus.

Wouldn't it have been nice if the Dahmerville city council would have cared about Onamia's future like Fairmont's council cares about it's city?

"In short, setting precedent was his concern. He feared the code change would give leverage to other business owners seeking to move into parts of town where their operations aren't compatible with existing business."

"... If we change the rule for one private business,
we would have to do it for everybody."
Commissioner Tom Hawkins

Once again, Nexus isn't compatible... Why can't they follow the rules? Why do they act like the rules don't apply to them? What makes THEM so special???? Like spoiled rotten children, Nexus cannot tolerate anyone telling them "no". But they don't just kick and scream, they threaten and attack. (If you don't believe me, watch them quote parts of this blog in their bogus lawsuit against me.)

So, Nexus is making an appeal to the Fairmont city council.

Who do you think will win?

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

The Goose and the Gander

I've never been quite so confident about winning the law suits as I am right now. It seems even Free-angelo's own lawyer has doubts about their case against Hannabelle. I'm not a lawyer, (although I've certainly learned a lot in this past year of sewage), but even I can tell that their case stinks.

One by one, their lawyer's arguments crumble away. So he just invents new ones. He's backed off the fixation on the FBI, after he finally seems to understand that the FBI has indeed been investigating. What's funny is: I told D'Angelo back in December 2007 (just prior to the first lawsuit) that the FBI was involved. Is it my fault that he didn't believe me???? So sue me.

Now he's saying that my calling D'Angelo a "liar" and a "snake" probably isn't defamation after all. Then why did they sue me for saying these things in the first place if even THEY know it is not defamation??? I knew it wasn't defamation when I wrote it. Or I wouldn't have written it. Hannabelle does NOT defame anyone. It is not my fault if Free-angelo defamed themselves by their own bad actions. I just called them on it. In order for me to have defamed them, I would have had to tell untruths about them. I have told the Truth. And as old Bill Hill said: everyone's entitled to their opinion. I admit to being highly opinionated... And when it comes to Nexusians, I am LOWly opinionated. BUT - I have not done anything wrong. A "snake" is a metaphor. And the other thing? Well, I have proof. :) So anyway, he's backing off the liar and snake stuff.

Still holding fast to the "predator" thing... although that, too is just a metaphor, an opinion. I was surprised to hear that they took that to mean something sexual. Like a sexual predator. I NEVER SAID THAT nor did I imply that. I believe it is clear in my article that I was talking about such correctional institutions who bully themselves into places they are not wanted - choosing neighborhoods like ours to infiltrate because we don't have the strength or the money to fight them. Why they would equate the term "predator" to something sexual and get all bent out of shape about it is something THEY will have to figure out. Its not my problem.

Actually, they base their case on one article I wrote a long time ago and pulled off the Internet to keep them from suing me (sacrificing my right to free speech to save myself the hassle of the lawsuits) and they sued me anyway. What they do is pull OUT OF CONTEXT - part of a story I wrote about the day I was erroneously told that Jim D'Angelo committed suicide. Of course, unfortunately, it turned out to be someone else who worked at Nexus and not the King of the World himself. If you take what I said out of context, it doesn't sound pretty. But in the context of the story, there is no way anyone with half a brain could ever think that I was serious when I said we think Jim D'Angelo is kinky. The whole business is quite silly. What do I care if he's kinky or not? I just want the bastard out of my life. All of this has been about keeping THEM away. Obviously, it hasn't worked. Anyway, the story was a true account of the day, but oddly enough, it was Poncho who said most of the stuff I'm getting sued for. I wonder why they sued me and not Poncho? hmmm. Or my 85 year old mother who thinks that D'Angelo is the Devil himself. She calls him "evil." So sue her. Sue us all. Sue the whole fucking town, because, quite frankly, although they are greedy for your money, I haven't heard a single good comment about you, Poopsie. Not here in Nexusville.

ANYWAY, their slant on the case seems to have shifted. Now they seem to be complaining that although I may be innocent of any defamation, its still MY FAULT for filing the anti-SLAPP motion which automatically denied them Discovery. Huh? Well! The fools! All they have to do is read my blog and my newspaper to discover whatever they need to discover. And if they didn't realize that they didn't have a case BEFORE they sued me, well.... what can I say? (perhaps a new lawyer???)

My case is a textbook anti-SLAPP action. They have used the justice system to hurt me, to silence me, and to stop me from seeking favorable governmental action. It seems extremely personal. And if you think that by calling somebody "Poopsie" on the Internet caused (oh boo-whoo) damages, wait 'til you hear the total damages these lawsuits have caused ME. And apparently we are just in the beginning stages. There's the appeal, the jury trial (MY trial!), and their appeals after the game's over. They lose. I'm sure this will go on for years and years. Good thing for me that I'm chronically ill and can't do much of anything anyway. So what if I never write music again. I might be on Court TV!!!! I guess they call it True TV now. Perfect!

"But Hannabelle!" you say. "What about the Goose and the Gander? What is this title about?"

It's like the old saying: What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Well, I have sat through two court hearings where the plaintiffs' lawyer is bashing me to the judge! I've been called names. I've been severely criticized. For example, I've been called "caustic". Yet, I am being sued for calling someone "heartless".

Caustic/heartless..... heartless/caustic..... hmmm.

Their attorney said in court: I think she just sits at her computer and makes it all up because she thinks its funny!

hmmm.

So it is alright for that lawyer to express his opinion of me, call me names, and tell lies which malign MY character. That's o.k.?

But I get in trouble for telling the truth.

So I look at it like this. I should be able to sue that lawyer for saying bad stuff about me. Right? And since he represents Nexus and Free-angelo, I should be able to sue them too. Right?

What's good for the gander is also good for the goose.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Like A Good Neighbor....

WE THE OPPRESSORS DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR TO SUE HANNABELLE OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN UNTIL SHE IS DEAD. HOW DARE SHE WRITE ABOUT OUR VICIOUS NATURE AND TELL THE WORLD OUR SECRETS. DEFAMAAAAAATION!!!!! DEFAMAAAATION!!!!! HOW DARE HANNABELLE EXPOSE OUR LIES.

HOW DARE SHE NOT LOVE AND RESPECT US. WE'LL MAKE HER PAY FOR HER DISDAIN!!! WHAT DOES SHE THINK THIS IS, ANYWAY??? THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA??? HA! NOT ANYMORE. NOW IT IS CORPORATE AMERICA!!!!!

WHAT HAVE WE EVER DONE TO HER? - EXCEPT FORCE OURSELVES INTO HER LIFE, DESTROY HER NEIGHBORHOOD, GET HER PROPERTY TAXES RAISED (BY 28 %), LOWER HER PROPERTY VALUES, SIC OUR EMPLOYEES ON HER, OSTRACIZE HER FROM SOCIETY, IGNORE HER, PERSECUTE HER AND ABUSE THE LEGAL JUSTICE SYSTEM AS WE SUE SUE SUE HER!!!!! WHY CAN'T SHE SEE THAT WE ARE GOOD PEOPLE???!!!!! WE ARE COMPASSIONATE!!!! WE HAVE CORNERSTONE VALUES!!!!! IT SAYS SO IN THE BROCHURE!

BUT WE'LL SHOW HANNABELLE. WE'LL TEACH HER NOT TO FUCK WITH THE CORPORATION. NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN OUR CORPORATE AMERICA. WE'LL BEAT HER UP UNTIL SHE GROVELS ON THE FLOOR, BEGGING US TO LET US SHOW HER WHAT A GOOD NEIGHBOR WE ARE. WE WILL MAKE HER STOP TALKING. WE WILL USE FORCE IF NECESSARY, ALTHOUGH INTIMIDATION IS OUR STRATEGY OF CHOICE. OF COURSE, WE WILL BLEEEEEEEEEED HER DRY. WE WILL CONTINUE TO RAPE HER UNTIL SHE BEGS US FOR MORE!!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Yep. The Nexus Corporation is proceeding with yet another lawsuit against me. Apparently they do read my blog. They just don't seem to be able to understand what I say. Maybe my sword is getting as dull as their wits. (Hone, girl. Hone.)

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Doth Thous Protesteth Too Much?

One of the most puzzling aspects of my current situation - i.e. sex offender treatment center "professionals" brutally trying to destroy my life - one suing me for calling him "Poopsie" and the other one suing me because I caused him "embarrassment", and the big Motherload waiting in the wings with yet another law suit pending, is why on earth would they go to such lengths and expense to persecute me? Little ol' Hannabelle isn't any threat to them.

Or am I?

Hmmm. One wonders why they refused to communicate with me. I've talked about their Silent Treatment before. But if you think long and hard about it, their behavior does not even make sense. It's a bit over the top... Why wouldn't they just listen to me? Aren't these people supposed to have training in psychology, public relations, you know - mental health stuff... Didn't they know the importance of "being heard"? Instead, they bullied me. And of course, that didn't work. But wouldn't you think that they would change their strategy then? Aren't they used to working with "troubled children"? It makes me wonder how they treat their clients. LESTER! KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF BOBBY'S PEEPEE OR WE WILL SUE THE LIFE OUT OF YOU!!!!

Other than sitting on them (which sometimes kills a child) how do these professionals deal with their clients. I've received emails from parents which say that the MLA isn't a very nice place... But, the quality control of sex offender institutions is not my business. That is someone else's fight. Quality control of my family's life IS my business. Freedom of Speech IS my business.

Remember when the Poopster told me that he was going to sic all the MLA employees on me? What was THAT all about? I got a lot of anonymous comments on this blog, some of them very threatening. I never said that Poops is the one who sent me the death threats, although that is an issue he cites in the lawsuit. Kind of paranoid, if you ask me... (or grasping at straws in a bogus law suit). But he DID say he was basically gathering his army to make war with Hannabelle .... Why? Why not just act professional in dealing with a disgruntled neighbor who doesn't want sexually disturbed men right down her street? Why summons the troops? Why all the fuss? Yup. After only two years, I DO wonder what all the fuss is about. Not my fuss. Theirs. Specifically, his...

There's got to be more to it than meets the eye. Even Poopsie can't have an ego THAT big. This law suit is costing tens of thousands of dollars. And although it's probably greens fees to him, and R2D2 will most likely split the bill, why would they keep harassing and attacking me over something that definitely is a Done Deal? Why is it so essential to "get" Hannabelle? Or at least, to get Hannabelle to "go away" or shut up? What do you think they are afraid of? What do you think THEY think I'll find if I keep digging?

They sued me AFTER I removed the one specific blog entry they threatened to sue me about. Kind of like invading Iraq over weapons of mass destruction that weren't there. Why did they persist? They sued me just a few months before the bulldozers destroyed the property and the buildings went up. Didn't they figure it out that after the government bent over backwards to give them everything they wanted and after they destroyed my neighborhood, there was nothing more to fight about? I fought hard. Gave two years of my life to try to keep them from stealing my privacy, my rights, my higher tax dollars, my lower property values, my ..... bank account.... I know I lost. So why do they keep going after me?

It's a stupid law suit. Frivolous. A textbook SLAPP suit. An abuse of our justice system. A waste of the Court's time. And it was totally unnecessary. And yet, they went ahead with it. Why?

Maybe its time to lift the anonymous commenter ban and let anybody send me interesting information about Nexus. The question is: What are they hiding, and why are they so intent on destroying me?

The plot, as they say, thickens.